MCHB
Price
$14.17
Change
+$0.03 (+0.21%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.13B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDIBF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
16.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHB vs MDIBF

Header iconMCHB vs MDIBF Comparison
Open Charts MCHB vs MDIBFBanner chart's image
Mechanics Ban
Price$14.17
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
Volume$400.43K
Capitalization3.13B
MedioBanca SpA
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization16.54B
MCHB vs MDIBF Comparison Chart in %
MCHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHB vs. MDIBF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHB is a Buy and MDIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHB: $14.17 vs. MDIBF: $23.59)
Brand notoriety: MCHB and MDIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHB: 60% vs. MDIBF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MCHB: $3.13B vs. MDIBF: $16.54B
MCHB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.13B. MDIBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDIBF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MDIBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDIBF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MCHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

MCHB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while MDIBF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHB is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIBF($16.5B) has a higher market cap than MCHB($3.14B). MCHB has higher P/E ratio than MDIBF: MCHB (16.23) vs MDIBF (12.41). MDIBF YTD gains are higher at: 47.931 vs. MCHB (-99.947). MCHB has less debt than MDIBF: MCHB (281M) vs MDIBF (34.2B). MDIBF has higher revenues than MCHB: MDIBF (3.37B) vs MCHB (594M).
MCHBMDIBFMCHB / MDIBF
Capitalization3.14B16.5B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-99.94747.931-209%
P/E Ratio16.2312.41131%
Revenue594M3.37B18%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt281M34.2B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHB vs MDIBF: Fundamental Ratings
MCHB
MDIBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
1610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
932
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDIBF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (66). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHB (100). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (16). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (65). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBF (32). This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to MDIBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHBMDIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
46%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
13%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAFE42.610.25
+0.59%
PIMCO RAFI ESG US ETF
SEIQ39.500.13
+0.33%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Qual Fac ETF
VEMY27.910.07
+0.25%
Virtus Stone Harbor Emr Mkt Hi Yld BdETF
SHLD66.610.02
+0.03%
Global X Defense Tech ETF
FFOX28.34N/A
+0.02%
Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with MDIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then MDIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
+0.21%
MDIBF - MCHB
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCBC - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MDIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIBF has been loosely correlated with MCHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDIBF jumps, then MCHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIBF
1D Price
Change %
MDIBF100%
N/A
MCHB - MDIBF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
JDVB - MDIBF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBKC - MDIBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPHLF - MDIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBK - MDIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More