57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCH vs YUMC
MCH vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts MCH vs YUMC
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.25
Change+$0.67 (+2.43%)
Volume$281
Net Assets23.33M
Yum China Holdings
Price$44.93
Change+$0.23 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization16.46B
MCH vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCH vs. YUMC commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCH is a StrongBuy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
YUMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCH | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCH and DIDIY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCH and DIDIY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +2.46% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| TCOM - MCH | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| YUMC - MCH | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
YUMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| YUM - YUMC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| DPZ - YUMC | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| HDL - YUMC | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| ARCO - YUMC | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| QSR - YUMC | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||