53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCH vs PDD
MCH vs PDD Comparison
Open Charts MCH vs PDD
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$29.51
Change-$0.20 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.26K
Net Assets23.64M
PDD Holdings
Price$129.99
Change-$1.02 (-0.78%)
Volume$5.48M
Capitalization184.54B
MCH vs PDD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCH vs. PDD commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCH is a Hold and PDD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDD: Fundamental Ratings
PDD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCH | PDD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCH and DIDIY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCH and DIDIY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| TCOM - MCH | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| YUMC - MCH | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||
PDD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDD has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDD jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| BABA - PDD | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| VIPS - PDD | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| JD - PDD | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| RERE - PDD | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| BZUN - PDD | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||