Intraday BUY SELL Signals
109 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCH vs PDD
MCH vs PDD Comparison
Open Charts MCH vs PDD
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.82
Change-$0.10 (-0.35%)
Volume$6.56K
Net Assets23.1M
PDD Holdings
Price$117.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.43%)
Volume$4.65M
Capitalization166.38B
MCH vs PDD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCH vs. PDD commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCH is a Hold and PDD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDD: Fundamental Ratings
PDD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCH | PDD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 15 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
PDD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDD has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDD jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| BABA - PDD | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| JD - PDD | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| VIPS - PDD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| BZUN - PDD | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| HEPS - PDD | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||