Intraday BUY SELL Signals
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCH vs PDD
MCH vs PDD Comparison
Open Charts MCH vs PDD
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$29.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.06M
PDD Holdings
Price$134.55
Change-$1.49 (-1.10%)
Volume$106.9K
Capitalization193.13B
MCH vs PDD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCH vs. PDD commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCH is a Hold and PDD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDD: Fundamental Ratings
PDD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCH | PDD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
PDD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDD has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDD jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| BABA - PDD | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| JD - PDD | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| VIPS - PDD | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| BZUN - PDD | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| HEPS - PDD | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||