Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs VIGRX
MCGFX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs VIGRX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$14.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.56M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$253.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets357.2B
MCGFX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. VIGRX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MCGFX (205M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: VIGRX (0.30) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: MCGFX (31 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). MCGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: MCGFX (2000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.49 vs. MCGFX (3.90). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 99.11 vs. MCGFX (-40.05).
| MCGFX | VIGRX | MCGFX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.17 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.565 | 19.764 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 205M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 18.49 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.48 | 110.82 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.05 | 99.11 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.89 | 349.13 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement