Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGEBX
MCGFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGEBX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$12.76
Change-$0.21 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.75M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
MCGFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MCGFX (200M). MCGFX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than MCGFX (0.97). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGEBX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. MCGFX (-1.85). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. MCGFX (-33.46).
| MCGFX | RGEBX | MCGFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.09 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.248 | 4.829 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | 7.68 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.83 | 51.01 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.46 | 45.42 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.01 | 65.87 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement