Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGEBX
MCGFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGEBX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Growth N
Price$10.33
Change-$4.00 (-27.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.39M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MCGFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MCGFX (201M). MCGFX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MCGFX (0.96). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGEBX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. MCGFX (-16.15). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. MCGFX (-51.09).
| MCGFX | RGEBX | MCGFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.08 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.08 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.343 | -1.057 | -411% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.15 | 1.80 | -898% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.17 | 41.63 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.09 | 9.88 | -517% |
| Returns for 10 years | -43.53 | 110.02 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers