Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAHX
MCGFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAHX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Growth N
Price$10.16
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.9M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
MCGFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MCGFX (202M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAHX (0.44) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). MCGFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAHX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. MCGFX (-19.17). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. MCGFX (-50.47).
| MCGFX | RGAHX | MCGFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.44 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.44 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.993 | 9.109 | -187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.17 | 5.91 | -325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.70 | 67.08 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.47 | 23.08 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | -62.30 | 94.58 | -66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers