Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAGX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$14.13
Change+$0.09 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.49M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.77
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MCGFX (211M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAGX (0.59) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. MCGFX (5.37). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. MCGFX (-34.59).
| MCGFX | RGAGX | MCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.30 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.441 | 17.733 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | 13.24 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.62 | 74.37 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.59 | 49.92 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.80 | 118.54 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement