Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAGX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$12.76
Change-$0.21 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.75M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MCGFX (200M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAGX (0.65) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. MCGFX (-1.85). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.11 vs. MCGFX (-33.46).
| MCGFX | RGAGX | MCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.30 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.248 | 5.205 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | 7.67 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.83 | 54.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.46 | 51.11 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.01 | 75.62 | -67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement