Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAGX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.80
Change-$0.11 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.52
Change-$1.04 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. MCGFX (213M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAGX (0.60) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. MCGFX (3.60). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. MCGFX (-37.04).
| MCGFX | RGAGX | MCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.30 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.745 | 13.374 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 12.82 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.85 | 46.39 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.04 | 42.08 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.97 | 100.59 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers