Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGABX
MCGFX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGABX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.80
Change-$0.11 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$74.79
Change-$0.92 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
MCGFX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. MCGFX (213M). MCGFX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGABX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCGFX (0.97). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGABX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. MCGFX (3.60). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.23 vs. MCGFX (-37.04).
| MCGFX | RGABX | MCGFX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.39 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.745 | 12.602 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 10.57 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.85 | 39.93 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.04 | 32.23 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.97 | 81.62 | -56% |