MCFNF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.31M
VTS
Price
$25.66
Change
+$0.12 (+0.47%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
990.44M
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCFNF vs VTS

Header iconMCFNF vs VTS Comparison
Open Charts MCFNF vs VTSBanner chart's image
MCF ENERGY
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$482.01K
Capitalization12.31M
Vitesse Energy
Price$25.66
Change+$0.12 (+0.47%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization990.44M
MCFNF vs VTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCFNF vs. VTS commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFNF is a Hold and VTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MCFNF: $0.05 vs. VTS: $25.54)
Brand notoriety: MCFNF and VTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCFNF: 308% vs. VTS: 113%
Market capitalization -- MCFNF: $12.33M vs. VTS: $986.19M
MCFNF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $12.33M. VTS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $986.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCFNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCFNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCFNF is a better buy in the long-term than VTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCFNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCFNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCFNF is a better buy in the short-term than VTS.

Price Growth

MCFNF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +22.50% price change this week, while VTS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

VTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.70% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTS($990M) has a higher market cap than MCFNF($12.3M). MCFNF YTD gains are higher at: 41.210 vs. VTS (7.086). VTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 177M vs. MCFNF (-11.51M). VTS has more cash in the bank: 1.96M vs. MCFNF (808K). VTS has higher revenues than MCFNF: VTS (262M) vs MCFNF (0).
MCFNFVTSMCFNF / VTS
Capitalization12.3M990M1%
EBITDA-11.51M177M-7%
Gain YTD41.2107.086582%
P/E RatioN/A23.53-
Revenue0262M-
Total Cash808K1.96M41%
Total DebtN/A112M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCFNFVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AYALY11.01N/A
N/A
Ayala Corp.
IEHC8.00N/A
N/A
IEH Corp.
CNDAU12.99N/A
N/A
Concord Acquisition Corp II
AFBOF9.47N/A
N/A
African Rainbow Minerals Ltd.
BLHK29.75-0.25
-0.83%
BlueHarbor Bank (Mooresville NC)

MCFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCFNF and ALOD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCFNF and ALOD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCFNF
1D Price
Change %
MCFNF100%
+26.94%
ALOD - MCFNF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTVRF - MCFNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRNT - MCFNF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
TXO - MCFNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
VTS - MCFNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
More

VTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTS has been closely correlated with CRGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTS jumps, then CRGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VTS
1D Price
Change %
VTS100%
-1.84%
CRGY - VTS
76%
Closely correlated
-5.19%
CHRD - VTS
75%
Closely correlated
-3.78%
NOG - VTS
74%
Closely correlated
-4.53%
OVV - VTS
73%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
PR - VTS
73%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
More