Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWHX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$14.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.53M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.02
Change-$0.41 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. MCEMX (326M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: RNWHX (0.99) vs MCEMX (0.62). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MCEMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.39 vs. RNWHX (16.04). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.58 vs. MCEMX (13.58).
| MCEMX | RNWHX | MCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.559 | 17.101 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 70.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.39 | 16.04 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.04 | 40.30 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.58 | 29.58 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers