Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWHX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$13.84
Change-$0.24 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.54M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. MCEMX (315M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: RNWHX (1.04) vs MCEMX (0.57). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MCEMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. RNWHX (8.20). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.47 vs. MCEMX (18.46).
| MCEMX | RNWHX | MCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.190 | 11.773 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 67.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.04 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 8.20 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.65 | 35.09 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 33.47 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement