Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWBX
MCEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWBX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS
Price$13.84
Change-$0.24 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.54M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.86
Change-$1.00 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
MCEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. MCEMX (315M). MCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCEMX (0.57) vs RNWBX (0.13). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCEMX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCEMX (0.83). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCEMX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWBX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. RNWBX (7.09). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.56 vs. MCEMX (18.46).
| MCEMX | RNWBX | MCEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.67 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.67 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.190 | 11.298 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 67.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.13 | 426% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 7.09 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.65 | 32.44 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 28.56 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.35 | 54.60 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement