MCEM
Price
$237.00
Change
-$0.98 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
351.9M
SMID
Price
$33.94
Change
-$0.99 (-2.83%)
Updated
Jul 7, 01:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
247.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCEM vs SMID

Header iconMCEM vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts MCEM vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Monarch Cement Co. (The)
Price$237.00
Change-$0.98 (-0.41%)
Volume$137
Capitalization351.9M
Smith-Midland
Price$33.94
Change-$0.99 (-2.83%)
Volume$100
Capitalization247.2M
MCEM vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCEM vs. SMID commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEM is a StrongBuy and SMID is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MCEM: $237.00 vs. SMID: $34.93)
Brand notoriety: MCEM and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCEM: 17% vs. SMID: 12%
Market capitalization -- MCEM: $351.9M vs. SMID: $247.2M
MCEM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $351.9M. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $247.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCEM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCEM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCEM is a better buy in the long-term than SMID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the short-term than MCEM.

Price Growth

MCEM (@Construction Materials) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +10.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.66% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCEM($352M) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). MCEM YTD gains are higher at: 10.250 vs. SMID (-21.435). MCEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39M vs. SMID (3.43M). MCEM has less debt than SMID: MCEM (2.83M) vs SMID (5.94M). MCEM has higher revenues than SMID: MCEM (166M) vs SMID (57.7M).
MCEMSMIDMCEM / SMID
Capitalization352M247M143%
EBITDA39M3.43M1,136%
Gain YTD10.250-21.435-48%
P/E RatioN/A427.45-
Revenue166M57.7M288%
Total CashN/A5.85M-
Total Debt2.83M5.94M48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCEM vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
MCEM
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
245
SMR RATING
1..100
450
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCEM's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (71). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (45). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (50). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MCEM (51). This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to MCEM’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (98). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCEMSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUGG1.040.03
+2.93%
Augusta Gold Corp.
CIWV32.49N/A
N/A
Citizens Financial Corp. (WV)
JVTSF3.34N/A
N/A
JUVENTUS FOOTBALL CLUB SPA, TORINO
ORINY37.18N/A
N/A
Orion Corporation OY
DTRUY23.93-0.16
-0.66%
DAIMLER TRUCK HLDG AG

MCEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCEM and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCEM and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCEM
1D Price
Change %
MCEM100%
-0.41%
PPCLY - MCEM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - MCEM
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
IMYSF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+1.25%
BCC - SMID
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
USLM - SMID
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
EXP - SMID
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
KNF - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
CRH - SMID
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More