MCEM
Price
$237.00
Change
-$0.98 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
351.9M
PPCLY
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
228.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCEM vs PPCLY

Header iconMCEM vs PPCLY Comparison
Open Charts MCEM vs PPCLYBanner chart's image
Monarch Cement Co. (The)
Price$237.00
Change-$0.98 (-0.41%)
Volume$137
Capitalization351.9M
PPC
Price$0.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23K
Capitalization228.55M
MCEM vs PPCLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPCLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCEM vs. PPCLY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEM is a StrongBuy and PPCLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MCEM: $237.00 vs. PPCLY: $0.61)
Brand notoriety: MCEM and PPCLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCEM: 17% vs. PPCLY: 465%
Market capitalization -- MCEM: $351.9M vs. PPCLY: $228.55M
MCEM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $351.9M. PPCLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $228.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCEM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePPCLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCEM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PPCLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCEM is a better buy in the long-term than PPCLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPCLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PPCLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCEM is a better buy in the short-term than PPCLY.

Price Growth

MCEM (@Construction Materials) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while PPCLY (@Construction Materials) price change was +19.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.66% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCEM($352M) has a higher market cap than PPCLY($229M). PPCLY YTD gains are higher at: 55.705 vs. MCEM (10.250). MCEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39M vs. PPCLY (-512M). MCEM has less debt than PPCLY: MCEM (2.83M) vs PPCLY (1.51B). PPCLY has higher revenues than MCEM: PPCLY (9.85B) vs MCEM (166M).
MCEMPPCLYMCEM / PPCLY
Capitalization352M229M154%
EBITDA39M-512M-8%
Gain YTD10.25055.70518%
P/E RatioN/A3.93-
Revenue166M9.85B2%
Total CashN/A766M-
Total Debt2.83M1.51B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCEM vs PPCLY: Fundamental Ratings
MCEM
PPCLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
236
SMR RATING
1..100
490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PPCLY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MCEM (15). This means that PPCLY’s stock grew similarly to MCEM’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPCLY (36). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPCLY’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PPCLY (90). This means that MCEM’s stock grew significantly faster than PPCLY’s over the last 12 months.

PPCLY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MCEM (51). This means that PPCLY’s stock grew similarly to MCEM’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPCLY (98). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPCLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCEMPPCLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPCLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSCYX29.020.35
+1.22%
Hartford Small Company Y
FASOX49.970.26
+0.52%
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies I
VSQYX17.980.09
+0.50%
Invesco MSCI World SRI Index Y
ITRAX28.100.13
+0.46%
VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec A
FHEIX17.060.02
+0.12%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate I

MCEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCEM and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCEM and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCEM
1D Price
Change %
MCEM100%
-0.41%
PPCLY - MCEM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - MCEM
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
IMYSF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PPCLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PPCLY and SMID have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPCLY and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PPCLY
1D Price
Change %
PPCLY100%
N/A
SMID - PPCLY
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
MCEM - PPCLY
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
IBJHF - PPCLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - PPCLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMYSF - PPCLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More