Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCECX vs RNWFX
MCECX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts MCECX vs RNWFX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets C
Price$14.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.54M
American Funds New World R5
Price$91.55
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
MCECX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCECX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCECX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. MCECX (322M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than MCECX: RNWFX (1.04) vs MCECX (0.00). MCECX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: MCECX (7 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). MCECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCECX (19.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCECX: RNWFX (250) vs MCECX (1000). MCECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. RNWFX (14.21). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.26 vs. MCECX (4.06).
| MCECX | RNWFX | MCECX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.62 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.62 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.818 | 18.496 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 71.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 14.21 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.77 | 33.07 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.06 | 28.26 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers