Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCECX vs RNWFX
MCECX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts MCECX vs RNWFX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets C
Price$13.88
Change+$0.08 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.22M
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.05
Change+$0.56 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
MCECX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCECX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCECX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. MCECX (324M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than MCECX: RNWFX (1.04) vs MCECX (0.00). MCECX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: MCECX (7 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). MCECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCECX (19.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCECX: RNWFX (250) vs MCECX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. MCECX (10.16). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.20 vs. MCECX (12.20).
| MCECX | RNWFX | MCECX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.62 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.62 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.427 | 16.554 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.16 | 11.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.45 | 40.39 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.20 | 33.20 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers