Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCECX vs RNWBX
MCECX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCECX vs RNWBX
Martin Currie Emerging Markets C
Price$14.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.53M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
MCECX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCECX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCECX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. MCECX (326M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than MCECX: RNWBX (0.13) vs MCECX (0.00). MCECX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCECX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). MCECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. MCECX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCECX: RNWBX (250) vs MCECX (1000). MCECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.18 vs. RNWBX (14.84). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.82 vs. MCECX (7.51).
| MCECX | RNWBX | MCECX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.67 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.67 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.829 | 16.479 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 70.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.18 | 14.84 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.98 | 37.52 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.51 | 24.82 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers