MCDMF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
ODV
Price
$1.44
Change
-$0.04 (-2.72%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

MCDMF vs ODV

Header iconMCDMF vs ODV Comparison
Open Charts MCDMF vs ODVBanner chart's image
MacDonald Mines Exploration
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
Osisko Development
Price$1.44
Change-$0.04 (-2.72%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
MCDMF vs ODV Comparison Chart
Loading...
ODV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCDMF vs. ODV commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDMF is a Hold and ODV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (MCDMF: $0.03 vs. ODV: $1.47)
Brand notoriety: MCDMF and ODV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCDMF: 16% vs. ODV: 94%
Market capitalization -- MCDMF: $1.91M vs. ODV: $179.3M
MCDMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.91M. ODV’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $179.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCDMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileODV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCDMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ODV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCDMF is a better buy in the long-term than ODV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ODV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ODV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MCDMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.48% price change this week, while ODV (@Precious Metals) price change was -18.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ODV($179M) has a higher market cap than MCDMF($1.91M). MCDMF YTD gains are higher at: -22.535 vs. ODV (-49.485). MCDMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.2M vs. ODV (-85.5M). ODV has more cash in the bank: 71.5M vs. MCDMF (118K). MCDMF has less debt than ODV: MCDMF (0) vs ODV (19.7M). ODV has higher revenues than MCDMF: ODV (43.9M) vs MCDMF (0).
MCDMFODVMCDMF / ODV
Capitalization1.91M179M1%
EBITDA-2.2M-85.5M3%
Gain YTD-22.535-49.48546%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue043.9M-
Total Cash118K71.5M0%
Total Debt019.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCDMF vs ODV: Fundamental Ratings
MCDMF
ODV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3653
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6090
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ODV's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCDMF (79). This means that ODV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

ODV's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as MCDMF (100). This means that ODV’s stock grew similarly to MCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

ODV's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as MCDMF (99). This means that ODV’s stock grew similarly to MCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

MCDMF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as ODV (90). This means that MCDMF’s stock grew similarly to ODV’s over the last 12 months.

MCDMF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ODV (100). This means that MCDMF’s stock grew significantly faster than ODV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ODV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ODV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

MCDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCDMF and ODV have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCDMF and ODV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCDMF
1D Price
Change %
MCDMF100%
+32.85%
ODV - MCDMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
OMMSF - MCDMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.93%
OSIIF - MCDMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LONCF - MCDMF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - MCDMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More

ODV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ODV has been loosely correlated with GORO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ODV jumps, then GORO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ODV
1D Price
Change %
ODV100%
-4.55%
GORO - ODV
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
DRD - ODV
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
MTA - ODV
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
HMY - ODV
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
NFGC - ODV
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
More