MCDIF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
SLND
Price
$3.46
Change
-$0.03 (-0.86%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

MCDIF vs SLND

Header iconMCDIF vs SLND Comparison
Open Charts MCDIF vs SLNDBanner chart's image
McDermott International
Price$0.12
Change-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Volume$2.44K
CapitalizationN/A
Southland Holdings
Price$3.46
Change-$0.03 (-0.86%)
Volume$834
CapitalizationN/A
MCDIF vs SLND Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCDIF vs. SLND commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDIF is a Hold and SLND is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MCDIF: $0.12 vs. SLND: $3.49)
Brand notoriety: MCDIF and SLND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCDIF: 0% vs. SLND: 21%
Market capitalization -- MCDIF: $0 vs. SLND: $162.6M
MCDIF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $0. SLND’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $162.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCDIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCDIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MCDIF and SLND are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MCDIF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -14.29% price change this week, while SLND (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLND is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.48% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDIF YTD gains are higher at: 33.333 vs. SLND (-32.364).
MCDIFSLNDMCDIF / SLND
CapitalizationN/A168M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.333-32.364-103%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

MCDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCDIF and OPMXF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCDIF and OPMXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCDIF
1D Price
Change %
MCDIF100%
-14.29%
OPMXF - MCDIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.71%
AFXXF - MCDIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIPI - MCDIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EKIVY - MCDIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLND - MCDIF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
More

SLND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLND and GLDD have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLND and GLDD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLND
1D Price
Change %
SLND100%
-1.97%
GLDD - SLND
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
BBCP - SLND
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
STRL - SLND
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
ROAD - SLND
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
BWMN - SLND
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
More