Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs TCELX
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs TCELX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$14.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. TCELX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. TCELX (62.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than TCELX: MCDFX (2.83) vs TCELX (1.09). MCDFX was incepted earlier than TCELX: MCDFX (16 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX (2500) and TCELX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TCELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.20 vs. MCDFX (27.35). TCELX return over 5 years is better than : -5.79 vs. MCDFX (-8.14).
| MCDFX | TCELX | MCDFX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.67 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.538 | 35.070 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 62.5M | 156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 1.09 | 259% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.35 | 34.20 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.44 | 24.87 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.14 | -5.79 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement