Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs TCELX
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs TCELX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$13.84
Change-$0.30 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.84M
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. TCELX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. TCELX (61.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than TCELX: MCDFX (2.78) vs TCELX (1.08). MCDFX was incepted earlier than TCELX: MCDFX (16 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX (2500) and TCELX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX (27.74) and TCELX (26.73) have marching annual gain over last year. TCELX return over 5 years is better than : -3.28 vs. MCDFX (-3.89).
| MCDFX | TCELX | MCDFX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.67 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.884 | 28.744 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 61.8M | 168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.08 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.74 | 26.73 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | 30.67 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | -3.28 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement