Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs TCELX
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs TCELX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$14.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
MCDFX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. TCELX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. TCELX (63.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than TCELX: MCDFX (2.84) vs TCELX (1.09). MCDFX was incepted earlier than TCELX: MCDFX (16 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX (2500) and TCELX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. TCELX (29.59). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. TCELX (-6.54).
| MCDFX | TCELX | MCDFX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.67 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.849 | 32.837 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 63.5M | 156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.09 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 29.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.33 | 31.98 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | -6.54 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | N/A | - |