Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$13.11
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.85M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. RBCRX (6.85M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (2.84) vs RBCRX (1.35). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.81 vs. MCDFX (35.91).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.74 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.849 | 54.235 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 6.85M | 1,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.35 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 47.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.33 | 63.61 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | 37.72 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement