Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$9.94
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. RBCRX (5.18M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (3.26) vs RBCRX (1.76). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.77 vs. RBCRX (19.04).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.498 | 16.941 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.3M | 5.18M | 1,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.76 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.77 | 19.04 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.98 | -1.02 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.58 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.34 | 2.33 | 616% |