Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.25
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$10.99
Change-$0.07 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. RBCRX (5.76M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (3.08) vs RBCRX (1.68). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX (37.76) and MCDFX (37.34) have marching annual gain over last year.
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.179 | 29.294 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.7M | 5.76M | 1,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.68 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.34 | 37.76 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.73 | 22.65 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.19 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.67 | 14.28 | 285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement