Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs RBCRX
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$12.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62M
MCDFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. RBCRX (6.62M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than RBCRX: MCDFX (2.78) vs RBCRX (1.35). MCDFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MCDFX (16 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MCDFX (2500) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.15 vs. MCDFX (27.74).
| MCDFX | RBCRX | MCDFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 6.74 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.884 | 48.000 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 6.62M | 1,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.35 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.74 | 42.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | 60.84 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.67 | 31.88 | 115% |