Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$44.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. NGCAX (53M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (2.84) vs NGCAX (0.83). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (40.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (35.91) and NGCAX (34.69) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. NGCAX (-37.26).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.849 | 33.714 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 53M | 187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 0.83 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 34.69 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.33 | 38.69 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | -37.26 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | 25.97 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement