Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$43.73
Change-$0.09 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. NGCAX (52.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (2.78) vs NGCAX (0.79). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (40.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.68 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. NGCAX (-37.11).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.884 | 31.519 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 52.5M | 198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 0.79 | 351% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.74 | 30.68 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | 40.74 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | -37.11 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.67 | 22.30 | 164% |