Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs NGCAX
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs NGCAX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.23
Change+$0.46 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.51M
MCDFX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. NGCAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. NGCAX (50.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: MCDFX (2.83) vs NGCAX (0.86). MCDFX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: MCDFX (16 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. NGCAX (48.00). NGCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: NGCAX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.35 vs. NGCAX (25.05). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.14 vs. NGCAX (-36.06).
| MCDFX | NGCAX | MCDFX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.49 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.64 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.538 | 27.008 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 50.5M | 193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 0.86 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.35 | 25.05 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.44 | 13.28 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.14 | -36.06 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.04 | 22.63 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement