Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MIMFX
MCDFX vs MIMFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MIMFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
AMG Veritas China I
Price$17.18
Change+$0.15 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.71M
MCDFX vs MIMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MIMFX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a StrongBuy and MIMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. MIMFX (43.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MIMFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs MIMFX (1.32). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MIMFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MIMFX (14 years). MCDFX (1.32) and MIMFX (1.27) have similar cost to investors . MIMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIMFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MIMFX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.74 vs. MIMFX (27.44). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.85 vs. MIMFX (-52.94).
| MCDFX | MIMFX | MCDFX / MIMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.93 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.27 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.537 | 20.477 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 43.7M | 207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.32 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.74 | 27.44 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.40 | -14.13 | -81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.85 | -52.94 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.18 | -60.96 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement