Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICFX
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
Matthews China Instl
Price$18.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 456M vs. MCDFX (99.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MICFX: MCDFX (2.84) vs MICFX (1.46). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MICFX (49.99). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICFX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. MICFX (29.28). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. MICFX (-28.52).
| MCDFX | MICFX | MCDFX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.849 | 35.246 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 456M | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.46 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 29.28 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.33 | 33.83 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | -28.52 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | -7.17 | -605% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers