Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICFX
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.59
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
MCDFX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 475M vs. MCDFX (104M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MICFX: MCDFX (2.78) vs MICFX (1.43). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MICFX (49.99). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICFX (100000). MCDFX (27.74) and MICFX (27.07) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. MICFX (-28.36).
| MCDFX | MICFX | MCDFX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.884 | 31.073 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 475M | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.43 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.74 | 27.07 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | 39.82 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | -28.36 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.67 | -10.61 | -346% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement