Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICDX
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICDX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.07
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICDX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a StrongBuy and MICDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX (90.4M) and MICDX (90.4M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MICDX (3.37) and MCDFX (3.26) have matching dividends . MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MCDFX (75.80) and MICDX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX (40.36) and MCDFX (40.17) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -3.55 vs. MCDFX (-4.14).
| MCDFX | MICDX | MCDFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.623 | 21.740 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 90.4M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 3.37 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.17 | 40.36 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.53 | 10.97 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.14 | -3.55 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.60 | 26.38 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement