Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICDX
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICDX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICDX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX (99.3M) and MICDX (99.3M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MICDX (2.93) and MCDFX (2.84) have matching dividends . MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MCDFX (75.80) and MICDX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX (35.98) and MCDFX (35.91) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -1.71 vs. MCDFX (-2.29).
| MCDFX | MICDX | MCDFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.849 | 34.950 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 99.3M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.93 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 35.98 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.33 | 36.84 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | -1.71 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | 45.41 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement