Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICDX
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICDX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.25
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.28
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICDX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX (95.7M) and MICDX (95.7M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MICDX (3.18) and MCDFX (3.08) have matching dividends . MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MCDFX (75.80) and MICDX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX (37.53) and MCDFX (37.34) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -5.55 vs. MCDFX (-6.19).
| MCDFX | MICDX | MCDFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.179 | 23.294 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.7M | 95.7M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 3.18 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.34 | 37.53 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.73 | 17.19 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.19 | -5.55 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.67 | 42.77 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement