Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICDX
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICDX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICDX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX (99.4M) and MICDX (99.4M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MICDX (2.99) and MCDFX (2.90) have matching dividends . MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MCDFX (75.80) and MICDX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX (48.60) and MCDFX (48.42) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : 0.26 vs. MCDFX (-0.40).
| MCDFX | MICDX | MCDFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.279 | 28.388 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.4M | 99.4M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 2.99 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.42 | 48.60 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.28 | 22.76 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.40 | 0.26 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.29 | 47.45 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement