Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MICDX
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MICDX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.30
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$13.33
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
MCDFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MICDX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX (93.9M) and MICDX (93.9M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MCDFX (3.62) and MICDX (3.48) have matching dividends . MCDFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MCDFX (75.80) and MICDX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: MCDFX (2500) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX (22.32) and MCDFX (22.13) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -2.71 vs. MCDFX (-3.33).
| MCDFX | MICDX | MCDFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.616 | 12.680 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 93.9M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 3.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.13 | 22.32 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.33 | 3.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.33 | -2.71 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.16 | 3.62 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement