Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.49M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. MCSMX (65.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (2.83) vs MCSMX (1.07). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX (26.20) and MCSMX (25.43) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.82 vs. MCSMX (-35.99).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.587 | 27.093 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 65.5M | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 1.07 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.20 | 25.43 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.26 | 10.29 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.82 | -35.99 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.01 | 43.57 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement