Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.30
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.95
Change-$0.18 (-1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. MCSMX (65.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (3.62) vs MCSMX (1.28). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. MCSMX (10.81). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.33 vs. MCSMX (-41.28).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.616 | 9.581 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 65.7M | 143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.28 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.13 | 10.81 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.33 | -12.89 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.33 | -41.28 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.16 | 0.07 | 3,316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers