Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.49M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. MCSMX (65.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (2.83) vs MCSMX (1.07). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.67 vs. MCSMX (29.41). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.21 vs. MCSMX (-41.67).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.737 | 27.974 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 65.5M | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 1.07 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.67 | 29.41 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.70 | 6.96 | 312% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.21 | -41.67 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.53 | 34.02 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement