Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.49
Change-$0.32 (-2.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.74M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. MCSMX (72.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (2.78) vs MCSMX (1.01). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.67 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. MCSMX (-42.64).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.884 | 26.542 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 72.7M | 143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.01 | 277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.74 | 29.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | 21.07 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | -42.64 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.67 | 37.39 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement