Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCSMX
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCSMX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.28M
MCDFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. MCSMX (62.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: MCDFX (3.26) vs MCSMX (1.22). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCDFX (2500) and MCSMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.77 vs. MCSMX (18.92). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.58 vs. MCSMX (-46.48).
| MCDFX | MCSMX | MCDFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.40 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.498 | 11.784 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 62.3M | 145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.22 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.77 | 18.92 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.98 | -17.31 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.58 | -46.48 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.34 | 13.29 | 108% |