Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCHFX
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCHFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
Matthews China Investor
Price$18.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCHFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a Buy and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 456M vs. MCDFX (99.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCHFX: MCDFX (2.84) vs MCHFX (1.42). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCDFX (2500) and MCHFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. MCHFX (29.20). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. MCHFX (-28.93).
| MCDFX | MCHFX | MCDFX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.849 | 35.119 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 456M | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.42 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 29.20 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.33 | 33.42 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | -28.93 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | -8.45 | -514% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement