Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDFX vs MCHFX
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts MCDFX vs MCHFX
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.07
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
Matthews China Investor
Price$16.15
Change-$0.09 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.19M
MCDFX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDFX vs. MCHFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDFX is a StrongBuy and MCHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 378M vs. MCDFX (90.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than MCHFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs MCHFX (1.72). MCDFX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: MCDFX (16 years) vs MCHFX (27 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCDFX (2500) and MCHFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.17 vs. MCDFX (40.17). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.14 vs. MCHFX (-28.25).
| MCDFX | MCHFX | MCDFX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.623 | 20.164 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 378M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.72 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.17 | 47.17 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.53 | 2.33 | 452% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.14 | -28.25 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.60 | -22.07 | -111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement