Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWHX
MCDCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$23.02
Change-$0.12 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.64B
MCDCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.6B vs. MCDCX (2.1B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MCDCX (0.99) vs RNWHX (0.93). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MCDCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWHX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). MCDCX (15.62) and RNWHX (15.38) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. MCDCX (9.50).
| MCDCX | RNWHX | MCDCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.72 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.72 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.310 | 24.375 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 74.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.93 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.62 | 15.38 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.81 | 57.29 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.50 | 29.08 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement