Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWBX
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$22.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
MCDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. MCDCX (1.98B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCDCX (0.97) vs RNWBX (0.12). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). MCDCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). MCDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.07 vs. RNWBX (18.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. MCDCX (-8.37).
| MCDCX | RNWBX | MCDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.67 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.67 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.506 | 20.612 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 75.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.12 | 822% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.07 | 18.68 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.33 | 40.84 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.37 | 7.66 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.25 | 83.29 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement