It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileREBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REBN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.76% price change this week, while REBN (@Restaurants) price change was -6.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.26%.
MCD is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
REBN is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2024.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
MCD | REBN | MCD / REBN | |
Capitalization | 208B | 4.63M | 4,495,353% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 2.275 | -74.118 | -3% |
P/E Ratio | 25.54 | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 53.4B | 6.43M | 830,611% |
MCD | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCD | REBN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago47% | 3 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago40% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago47% | 10 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago43% | 4 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago24% | 4 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago38% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MCD | 100% | -0.55% | ||
YUM - MCD | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
DENN - MCD | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
QSR - MCD | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
DRI - MCD | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
CBRL - MCD | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that REBN and BPZZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REBN and BPZZF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To REBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
REBN | 100% | +6.31% | ||
BPZZF - REBN | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
BROS - REBN | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
MCD - REBN | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
PBPB - REBN | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.11% | ||
HELFY - REBN | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
More |