MCD
Price
$307.58
Change
+$0.64 (+0.21%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
219.04B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QSR
Price
$70.41
Change
+$1.27 (+1.84%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.12B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCD vs QSR

Header iconMCD vs QSR Comparison
Open Charts MCD vs QSRBanner chart's image
McDonald's
Price$307.58
Change+$0.64 (+0.21%)
Volume$2.29M
Capitalization219.04B
Restaurant Brands International
Price$70.41
Change+$1.27 (+1.84%)
Volume$2.31M
Capitalization23.12B
MCD vs QSR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCD vs. QSR commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCD is a Buy and QSR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MCD: $306.94 vs. QSR: $69.14)
Brand notoriety: MCD: Notable vs. QSR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCD: 94% vs. QSR: 82%
Market capitalization -- MCD: $219.04B vs. QSR: $23.12B
MCD [@Restaurants] is valued at $219.04B. QSR’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $23.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QSR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the long-term than MCD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCD’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QSR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the short-term than QSR.

Price Growth

MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was +3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

QSR is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.48% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($219B) has a higher market cap than QSR($23.1B). MCD (26.24) and QSR (24.97) have similar P/E ratio . QSR YTD gains are higher at: 9.114 vs. MCD (7.705). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.2B vs. QSR (2.44B). QSR has less debt than MCD: QSR (16B) vs MCD (55.9B). MCD has higher revenues than QSR: MCD (26.1B) vs QSR (9.11B).
MCDQSRMCD / QSR
Capitalization219B23.1B948%
EBITDA14.2B2.44B582%
Gain YTD7.7059.11485%
P/E Ratio26.2424.97105%
Revenue26.1B9.11B287%
Total Cash1.88BN/A-
Total Debt55.9B16B349%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCD vs QSR: Fundamental Ratings
MCD
QSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7117
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2143
SMR RATING
1..100
835
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (26) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCD (65). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (43). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (35). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (54). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (41). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDQSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QSR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CURE108.354.29
+4.12%
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
JEPI57.280.17
+0.30%
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
EMPB29.310.08
+0.28%
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
BSR29.57N/A
N/A
Beacon Selective Risk ETF
EWS28.69-0.09
-0.31%
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF

MCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCD
1D Price
Change %
MCD100%
+0.04%
YUM - MCD
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
QSR - MCD
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
DPZ - MCD
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
ARCO - MCD
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.27%
WEN - MCD
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
More

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
+0.36%
YUM - QSR
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
MCD - QSR
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
DPZ - QSR
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
FRSH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WEN - QSR
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
More