MCD
Price
$311.30
Change
+$2.20 (+0.71%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
222.6B
11 days until earnings call
QSR
Price
$63.22
Change
+$0.97 (+1.56%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MCD vs QSR

Header iconMCD vs QSR Comparison
Open Charts MCD vs QSRBanner chart's image
McDonald's
Price$311.30
Change+$2.20 (+0.71%)
Volume$2.73M
Capitalization222.6B
Restaurant Brands International
Price$63.22
Change+$0.97 (+1.56%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization20.38B
MCD vs QSR Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCD vs. QSR commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCD is a Hold and QSR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MCD: $311.30 vs. QSR: $63.22)
Brand notoriety: MCD: Notable vs. QSR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCD: 68% vs. QSR: 53%
Market capitalization -- MCD: $222.6B vs. QSR: $20.38B
MCD [@Restaurants] is valued at $222.6B. QSR’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $20.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCD’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MCD’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • QSR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the long-term than QSR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCD and QSR are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.71% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($223B) has a higher market cap than QSR($20.4B). MCD has higher P/E ratio than QSR: MCD (27.33) vs QSR (19.88). MCD YTD gains are higher at: 8.006 vs. QSR (-2.114). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.9B vs. QSR (2.66B). QSR has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. MCD (1.09B). QSR has less debt than MCD: QSR (16B) vs MCD (51.9B). MCD has higher revenues than QSR: MCD (25.9B) vs QSR (8.41B).
MCDQSRMCD / QSR
Capitalization223B20.4B1,093%
EBITDA13.9B2.66B522%
Gain YTD8.006-2.114-379%
P/E Ratio27.3319.88137%
Revenue25.9B8.41B308%
Total Cash1.09B1.33B81%
Total Debt51.9B16B324%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCD vs QSR: Fundamental Ratings
MCD
QSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3281
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
522
SMR RATING
1..100
828
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2939
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (21). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (22). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (28). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (56). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (39). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDQSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

MCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCD
1D Price
Change %
MCD100%
+0.71%
YUM - MCD
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
QSR - MCD
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
PZZA - MCD
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
DIN - MCD
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
WEN - MCD
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
+1.56%
YUM - QSR
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
MCD - QSR
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
TXRH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
DPZ - QSR
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
JACK - QSR
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
More