MCD
Price
$304.33
Change
+$1.14 (+0.38%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
217.17B
28 days until earnings call
PZZA
Price
$46.27
Change
+$0.44 (+0.96%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.52B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCD vs PZZA

Header iconMCD vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts MCD vs PZZABanner chart's image
McDonald's
Price$304.33
Change+$1.14 (+0.38%)
Volume$2.43M
Capitalization217.17B
Papa John's International
Price$46.27
Change+$0.44 (+0.96%)
Volume$487.52K
Capitalization1.52B
MCD vs PZZA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCD vs. PZZA commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCD is a Buy and PZZA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (MCD: $304.33 vs. PZZA: $46.27)
Brand notoriety: MCD: Notable vs. PZZA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCD: 73% vs. PZZA: 47%
Market capitalization -- MCD: $217.17B vs. PZZA: $1.52B
MCD [@Restaurants] is valued at $217.17B. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the long-term than PZZA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the short-term than MCD.

Price Growth

MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

PZZA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($217B) has a higher market cap than PZZA($1.52B). MCD has higher P/E ratio than PZZA: MCD (26.08) vs PZZA (20.29). PZZA YTD gains are higher at: 16.482 vs. MCD (6.789). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.2B vs. PZZA (215M). MCD has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. PZZA (33.3M). PZZA has less debt than MCD: PZZA (967M) vs MCD (55.9B). MCD has higher revenues than PZZA: MCD (26.1B) vs PZZA (2.09B).
MCDPZZAMCD / PZZA
Capitalization217B1.52B14,314%
EBITDA14.2B215M6,605%
Gain YTD6.78916.48241%
P/E Ratio26.0820.29129%
Revenue26.1B2.09B1,252%
Total Cash1.88B33.3M5,634%
Total Debt55.9B967M5,781%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCD vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
MCD
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4767
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5023

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PZZA's Valuation (13) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (28). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZZA (100). This means that MCD’s stock grew significantly faster than PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (6) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (8). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (57). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (67). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAP45.311.22
+2.77%
Molson Coors Beverage Company
XPL0.710.01
+2.16%
Solitario Resources Corp
SGU11.580.03
+0.26%
Star Group LP
VECO29.27-0.33
-1.11%
Veeco Instruments
CUBWU10.57-0.23
-2.13%
Lionheart Holdings

MCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCD
1D Price
Change %
MCD100%
+0.38%
YUM - MCD
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
QSR - MCD
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
PZZA - MCD
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
DPZ - MCD
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
ARCO - MCD
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
More

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with WEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then WEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
+0.96%
WEN - PZZA
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
DIN - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
DPZ - PZZA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PBPB - PZZA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
BH - PZZA
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
More