MCD
Price
$304.56
Change
+$4.45 (+1.48%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
217.34B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
NATH
Price
$109.35
Change
+$1.99 (+1.85%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
448.11M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCD vs NATH

Header iconMCD vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts MCD vs NATHBanner chart's image
McDonald's
Price$304.56
Change+$4.45 (+1.48%)
Volume$2.99M
Capitalization217.34B
Nathan's Famous
Price$109.35
Change+$1.99 (+1.85%)
Volume$53.22K
Capitalization448.11M
MCD vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCD vs. NATH commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCD is a Hold and NATH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MCD: $304.56 vs. NATH: $109.57)
Brand notoriety: MCD: Notable vs. NATH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCD: 98% vs. NATH: 150%
Market capitalization -- MCD: $217.34B vs. NATH: $448.11M
MCD [@Restaurants] is valued at $217.34B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $448.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than MCD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.78% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.62% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($217B) has a higher market cap than NATH($448M). MCD has higher P/E ratio than NATH: MCD (26.10) vs NATH (19.02). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 41.101 vs. MCD (6.870). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.2B vs. NATH (37M). MCD has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. NATH (26.9M). NATH has less debt than MCD: NATH (54.9M) vs MCD (55.9B). MCD has higher revenues than NATH: MCD (26.1B) vs NATH (150M).
MCDNATHMCD / NATH
Capitalization217B448M48,438%
EBITDA14.2B37M38,378%
Gain YTD6.87041.10117%
P/E Ratio26.1019.02137%
Revenue26.1B150M17,400%
Total Cash1.88B26.9M6,974%
Total Debt55.9B54.9M101,821%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCD vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
MCD
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6420
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2213
SMR RATING
1..100
840
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5231
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCD's Valuation (26) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATH (60). This means that MCD’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (22). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (60). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (52). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DAABX20.650.38
+1.87%
DFA US Sustainability Targeted Val Instl
SFPCX10.220.16
+1.59%
Saratoga Financial Service C
AFCWX18.210.02
+0.11%
American Century Focused Intl Gr R
FSDIX18.25N/A
N/A
Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income
IYITX24.57-0.09
-0.36%
Macquarie International Core Eq R

MCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCD
1D Price
Change %
MCD100%
+1.48%
YUM - MCD
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
QSR - MCD
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
ARCO - MCD
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
PZZA - MCD
27%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
NATH - MCD
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+1.85%
LOCO - NATH
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
BROS - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
RICK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
FWRG - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.82%
PZZA - NATH
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
More