Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$21.78
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.24
Change+$0.16 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. MCCPX (1.72B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (2.41) vs RLBFX (2.05). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. MCCPX (3.17). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. MCCPX (9.84).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.182 | 11.562 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 2.05 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.17 | 10.28 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.97 | 40.92 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.84 | 41.46 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.43 | 78.40 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement