Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$21.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. MCCPX (1.69B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (3.74) vs RLBFX (2.10). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. MCCPX (3.82). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. MCCPX (11.86).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.028 | 9.189 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 2.10 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 10.60 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.36 | 35.79 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.86 | 41.40 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.42 | 68.15 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement