Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$22.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. MCCPX (1.72B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (2.36) vs RLBFX (2.00). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. MCCPX (1.77). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. MCCPX (10.02).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.699 | 14.890 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 2.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | 9.05 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.11 | 51.85 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.02 | 43.90 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.86 | 78.80 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement