Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$22.17
Change-$0.20 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MCCPX (1.74B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (2.34) vs RLBFX (1.97). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. MCCPX (3.76). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. MCCPX (10.09).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.511 | 16.507 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 1.97 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | 10.28 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 44.74 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.09 | 43.06 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.94 | 81.39 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement