Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$22.31
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MCCPX (1.73B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (2.34) vs RLBFX (1.93). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. MCCPX (2.01). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. MCCPX (7.11).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.727 | 16.889 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 1.93 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 9.63 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.43 | 41.38 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.11 | 40.86 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.16 | 77.79 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement