Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$22.19
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. MCCPX (1.69B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (3.74) vs RLBFX (2.10). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. MCCPX (5.21). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.24 vs. MCCPX (17.73).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.250 | 8.222 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 2.10 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.21 | 8.18 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.07 | 36.13 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.73 | 43.24 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.77 | 68.15 | 20% |