Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCPX vs RLBFX
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MCCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor C
Price$21.62
Change-$0.18 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.69
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
MCCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. MCCPX (1.67B). MCCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MCCPX (3.85) vs RLBFX (2.18). MCCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MCCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MCCPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MCCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MCCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. MCCPX (3.55). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. MCCPX (17.21).
| MCCPX | RLBFX | MCCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.29 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.29 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.495 | 4.560 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 2.18 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.55 | 5.61 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.98 | 33.66 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.21 | 40.09 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.49 | 60.51 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement