MCCK
Price
$32.00
Change
-$3.75 (-10.49%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
TOTDY
Price
$25.44
Change
-$0.17 (-0.66%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MCCK vs TOTDY

Header iconMCCK vs TOTDY Comparison
Open Charts MCCK vs TOTDYBanner chart's image
Mestek
Price$32.00
Change-$3.75 (-10.49%)
Volume$103
CapitalizationN/A
Toto
Price$25.44
Change-$0.17 (-0.66%)
Volume$23.11K
CapitalizationN/A
MCCK vs TOTDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
TOTDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCCK vs. TOTDY commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCK is a Hold and TOTDY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MCCK: $32.00 vs. TOTDY: $25.44)
Brand notoriety: MCCK and TOTDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCCK: 28% vs. TOTDY: 161%
Market capitalization -- MCCK: $158.99M vs. TOTDY: $5.25B
MCCK [@Building Products] is valued at $158.99M. TOTDY’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $5.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCCK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTOTDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCCK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TOTDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCCK is a better buy in the long-term than TOTDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TOTDY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TOTDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MCCK (@Building Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TOTDY (@Building Products) price change was -8.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

TOTDY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-3.17% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOTDY($5.25B) has a higher market cap than MCCK($159M). TOTDY has higher P/E ratio than MCCK: TOTDY (18.48) vs MCCK (14.58). MCCK YTD gains are higher at: 33.333 vs. TOTDY (-1.767). TOTDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.6B vs. MCCK (22.8M). TOTDY has more cash in the bank: 98.1B vs. MCCK (58.1M). MCCK has less debt than TOTDY: MCCK (10.2M) vs TOTDY (24.7B). TOTDY has higher revenues than MCCK: TOTDY (692B) vs MCCK (351M).
MCCKTOTDYMCCK / TOTDY
Capitalization159M5.25B3%
EBITDA22.8M65.6B0%
Gain YTD33.333-1.767-1,886%
P/E Ratio14.5818.4879%
Revenue351M692B0%
Total Cash58.1M98.1B0%
Total Debt10.2M24.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCCK vs TOTDY: Fundamental Ratings
MCCK
TOTDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8773
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
764
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
788
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TOTDY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCCK (55). This means that TOTDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCCK’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as TOTDY (100). This means that MCCK’s stock grew similarly to TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOTDY (64). This means that MCCK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TOTDY (60). This means that MCCK’s stock grew similarly to TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.

MCCK's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TOTDY (88). This means that MCCK’s stock grew significantly faster than TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TOTDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TOTDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

MCCK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCCK and TOTDY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCCK and TOTDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCCK
1D Price
Change %
MCCK100%
N/A
TOTDY - MCCK
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
KGSPY - MCCK
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
TOTDF - MCCK
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPSGF - MCCK
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKWBF - MCCK
0%
Poorly correlated
-16.56%
More

TOTDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOTDY has been loosely correlated with DKILY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOTDY jumps, then DKILY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOTDY
1D Price
Change %
TOTDY100%
-0.69%
DKILY - TOTDY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
TOTDF - TOTDY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSGRY - TOTDY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
CODYY - TOTDY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
GBERY - TOTDY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More