MCBS
Price
$26.99
Change
+$0.32 (+1.20%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
629.13M
90 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$19.31
Change
+$0.14 (+0.73%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.9B
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MCBS vs RF

Header iconMCBS vs RF Comparison
Open Charts MCBS vs RFBanner chart's image
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$26.99
Change+$0.32 (+1.20%)
Volume$50.67K
Capitalization629.13M
Regions Financial
Price$19.31
Change+$0.14 (+0.73%)
Volume$18.65M
Capitalization18.9B
MCBS vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCBS vs. RF commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCBS is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MCBS: $26.99 vs. RF: $19.31)
Brand notoriety: MCBS: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCBS: 126% vs. RF: 194%
Market capitalization -- MCBS: $629.13M vs. RF: $18.9B
MCBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $629.13M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCBS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

MCBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.30% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than MCBS($629M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than RF: MCBS (11.86) vs RF (9.74). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: -14.904 vs. RF (-17.025). RF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. MCBS (251M). MCBS has less debt than RF: MCBS (334M) vs RF (2.33B). RF has higher revenues than MCBS: RF (7.57B) vs MCBS (118M).
MCBSRFMCBS / RF
Capitalization629M18.9B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.904-17.02588%
P/E Ratio11.869.74122%
Revenue118M7.57B2%
Total Cash251M1.55B16%
Total Debt334M2.33B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCBS vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MCBS
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2826
SMR RATING
1..100
257
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (62) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (91) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (28) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (25) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (50) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCBSRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X84895.750000861.882800
+1.03%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
+1.20%
CTBI - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
UBSI - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
IBOC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
FFBC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
BFC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.73%
HOMB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
AUB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
TFC - RF
85%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
HBAN - RF
80%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
MCBS - RF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
More