MCBS
Price
$26.25
Change
+$0.12 (+0.46%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
669.12M
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NBGIF
Price
$15.80
Change
+$1.07 (+7.26%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
13.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCBS vs NBGIF

Header iconMCBS vs NBGIF Comparison
Open Charts MCBS vs NBGIFBanner chart's image
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$26.25
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
Volume$61.02K
Capitalization669.12M
National Bank of Greece S.A
Price$15.80
Change+$1.07 (+7.26%)
Volume$184
Capitalization13.83B
MCBS vs NBGIF Comparison Chart in %
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBGIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCBS vs. NBGIF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCBS is a Buy and NBGIF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MCBS: $26.25 vs. NBGIF: $15.80)
Brand notoriety: MCBS and NBGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCBS: 159% vs. NBGIF: 7%
Market capitalization -- MCBS: $669.12M vs. NBGIF: $13.83B
MCBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $669.12M. NBGIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBGIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBGIF is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBGIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NBGIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCBS and NBGIF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while NBGIF (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIF($13.8B) has a higher market cap than MCBS($669M). NBGIF has higher P/E ratio than MCBS: NBGIF (11.75) vs MCBS (10.14). NBGIF YTD gains are higher at: 86.220 vs. MCBS (-15.414). MCBS has less debt than NBGIF: MCBS (433M) vs NBGIF (3.7B). NBGIF has higher revenues than MCBS: NBGIF (2.77B) vs MCBS (145M).
MCBSNBGIFMCBS / NBGIF
Capitalization669M13.8B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.41486.220-18%
P/E Ratio10.1411.7586%
Revenue145M2.77B5%
Total Cash279MN/A-
Total Debt433M3.7B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCBS vs NBGIF: Fundamental Ratings
MCBS
NBGIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
102
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
434
SMR RATING
1..100
3310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBGIF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (54). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (43). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (33). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (62). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCBS (83). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCBSNBGIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBGIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBMO25.600.05
+0.20%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF
SROI33.830.04
+0.11%
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sus Eqs ETF
GEME33.110.04
+0.11%
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
SMCO26.89-0.01
-0.05%
Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
BITB55.20-0.68
-1.22%
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-0.46%
FCBC - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
CTBI - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
FMBH - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
UBSI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
MBWM - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
More

NBGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBGIF and RRBI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBGIF and RRBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBGIF
1D Price
Change %
NBGIF100%
N/A
RRBI - NBGIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
MCBS - NBGIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
HACBY - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-12.41%
RBB - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
FBIZ - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More