MCBK
Price
$25.46
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
64.97M
MSVB
Price
$16.32
Change
+$0.08 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCBK vs MSVB

Header iconMCBK vs MSVB Comparison
Open Charts MCBK vs MSVBBanner chart's image
Madison County Financial
Price$25.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$225
Capitalization64.97M
Mid-Southern Ban
Price$16.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
Volume$200
Capitalization32.17M
MCBK vs MSVB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCBK vs. MSVB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCBK is a Hold and MSVB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MCBK: $25.46 vs. MSVB: $16.32)
Brand notoriety: MCBK and MSVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCBK: 9% vs. MSVB: 5%
Market capitalization -- MCBK: $64.97M vs. MSVB: $32.17M
MCBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $64.97M. MSVB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $32.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSVB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSVB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBK is a better buy in the long-term than MSVB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCBK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSVB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MSVB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCBK and MSVB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.59% price change this week, while MSVB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBK($65M) has a higher market cap than MSVB($32.2M). MSVB YTD gains are higher at: 9.102 vs. MCBK (3.272). MCBK has more cash in the bank: 5.73M vs. MSVB (1.25M). MSVB has less debt than MCBK: MSVB (28.2M) vs MCBK (51.6M). MCBK has higher revenues than MSVB: MCBK (15M) vs MSVB (8.88M).
MCBKMSVBMCBK / MSVB
Capitalization65M32.2M202%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.2729.10236%
P/E RatioN/A18.59-
Revenue15M8.88M169%
Total Cash5.73M1.25M458%
Total Debt51.6M28.2M183%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCBK vs MSVB: Fundamental Ratings
MCBK
MSVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9652
SMR RATING
1..100
781
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7138
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCBK's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSVB (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MCBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSVB’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBK (96) in the null industry. This means that MSVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBK’s over the last 12 months.

MCBK's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSVB (81) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MCBK’s stock grew significantly faster than MSVB’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MCBK (55) in the null industry. This means that MSVB’s stock grew similarly to MCBK’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBK (71) in the null industry. This means that MSVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCBKMSVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDXXF0.07N/A
+3.30%
PharmAla Biotech Holdings Inc.
TAVHY27.000.77
+2.92%
Tav Havalimanlari Holding AS
MANOF1.20N/A
N/A
Manolete Partners Plc
RXEEY30.93-0.01
-0.03%
Rexel SA
CSUAY15.68-0.02
-0.13%
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.

MCBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCBK and OTPBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCBK and OTPBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBK
1D Price
Change %
MCBK100%
N/A
OTPBF - MCBK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSVB - MCBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
BKPKF - MCBK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFNL - MCBK
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOBK - MCBK
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSVB has been closely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSVB jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSVB
1D Price
Change %
MSVB100%
+0.49%
OTPBF - MSVB
89%
Closely correlated
N/A
WOBK - MSVB
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MFDB - MSVB
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FTFI - MSVB
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - MSVB
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More