MCAP
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.91 (-8.27%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
112.86K
XIGMF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCAP vs XIGMF

Header iconMCAP vs XIGMF Comparison
Open Charts MCAP vs XIGMFBanner chart's image
MCAP
Price$10.10
Change-$0.91 (-8.27%)
Volume$100
Capitalization112.86K
Xigem Technologies
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization5.31M
MCAP vs XIGMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCAP vs. XIGMF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCAP is a Hold and XIGMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MCAP: $10.10 vs. XIGMF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: MCAP and XIGMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCAP: 62% vs. XIGMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MCAP: $112.86K vs. XIGMF: $5.31M
MCAP [@Packaged Software] is valued at $112.86K. XIGMF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXIGMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XIGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCAP is a better buy in the long-term than XIGMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCAP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MCAP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MCAP (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.27% price change this week, while XIGMF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XIGMF($5.31M) has a higher market cap than MCAP($113K). MCAP YTD gains are higher at: 94.073 vs. XIGMF (-57.290). MCAP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.39M vs. XIGMF (-13.11M). XIGMF has more cash in the bank: 362K vs. MCAP (219K). XIGMF has less debt than MCAP: XIGMF (155K) vs MCAP (2.2M). MCAP has higher revenues than XIGMF: MCAP (2.14M) vs XIGMF (0).
MCAPXIGMFMCAP / XIGMF
Capitalization113K5.31M2%
EBITDA-1.39M-13.11M11%
Gain YTD94.073-57.290-164%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.14M0-
Total Cash219K362K60%
Total Debt2.2M155K1,417%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCAP: Fundamental Ratings
MCAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCAPXIGMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCC43.661.49
+3.53%
Warrior Met Coal
NEUP7.000.20
+2.94%
Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc
STE238.790.26
+0.11%
STERIS plc
LXEO4.12-0.06
-1.44%
Lexeo Therapeutics
VIR5.17-0.14
-2.64%
Vir Biotechnology

MCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCAP has been loosely correlated with XIGMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCAP jumps, then XIGMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCAP
1D Price
Change %
MCAP100%
N/A
XIGMF - MCAP
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BRZE - MCAP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
IDCC - MCAP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
FRGE - MCAP
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
RVYL - MCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
More

XIGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIGMF has been loosely correlated with MCAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XIGMF jumps, then MCAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XIGMF
1D Price
Change %
XIGMF100%
N/A
MCAP - XIGMF
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATCH - XIGMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.15%
RVYL - XIGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
SWONF - XIGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
IDCC - XIGMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More