MC
Price
$70.40
Change
-$0.64 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
95 days until earnings call
VIRT
Price
$44.20
Change
+$0.43 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs VIRT

Header iconMC vs VIRT Comparison
Open Charts MC vs VIRTBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$70.40
Change-$0.64 (-0.90%)
Volume$1.56M
Capitalization3.79B
Virtu Financial
Price$44.20
Change+$0.43 (+0.98%)
Volume$925.44K
Capitalization1.83B
MC vs VIRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. VIRT commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and VIRT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MC: $70.40 vs. VIRT: $44.20)
Brand notoriety: MC and VIRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 177% vs. VIRT: 123%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. VIRT: $1.83B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. VIRT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVIRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • VIRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MC and VIRT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VIRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIRT is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while VIRT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

VIRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) has a higher market cap than VIRT($1.84B). MC has higher P/E ratio than VIRT: MC (82.58) vs VIRT (14.82). VIRT YTD gains are higher at: 25.463 vs. MC (-2.734). VIRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. MC (-32.04M). VIRT has more cash in the bank: 820M vs. MC (186M). MC has less debt than VIRT: MC (216M) vs VIRT (5.13B). VIRT has higher revenues than MC: VIRT (2.29B) vs MC (855M).
MCVIRTMC / VIRT
Capitalization3.79B1.84B206%
EBITDA-32.04M1.05B-3%
Gain YTD-2.73425.463-11%
P/E Ratio82.5814.82557%
Revenue855M2.29B37%
Total Cash186M820M23%
Total Debt216M5.13B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs VIRT: Fundamental Ratings
MC
VIRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1180
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3032
SMR RATING
1..100
2441
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
365

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (36). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (32). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (24) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (41). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (45). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

VIRT's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MC (100). This means that VIRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCVIRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MREGX15.610.16
+1.04%
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity R
IBSAX19.480.11
+0.57%
VY® Baron Growth A
MSEFX12.090.06
+0.50%
iMGP Global Select Instl
GQRIX18.610.01
+0.05%
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Instl
GSIYX22.42-0.06
-0.27%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R6

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-0.90%
EVR - MC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
PIPR - MC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
LAZ - MC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
PJT - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
PWP - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
More

VIRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIRT has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIRT jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIRT
1D Price
Change %
VIRT100%
+0.98%
MS - VIRT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
GS - VIRT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
SF - VIRT
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
EVR - VIRT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
MC - VIRT
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More