MC
Price
$76.00
Change
+$2.32 (+3.15%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:47 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.45B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VIRT
Price
$35.83
Change
+$0.65 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.99B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs VIRT

Header iconMC vs VIRT Comparison
Open Charts MC vs VIRTBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$76.00
Change+$2.32 (+3.15%)
Volume$775
Capitalization5.45B
Virtu Financial
Price$35.83
Change+$0.65 (+1.85%)
Volume$208
Capitalization2.99B
MC vs VIRT Comparison Chart in %
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. VIRT commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and VIRT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (MC: $73.68 vs. VIRT: $35.18)
Brand notoriety: MC and VIRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 88% vs. VIRT: 160%
Market capitalization -- MC: $5.45B vs. VIRT: $2.99B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.45B. VIRT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVIRT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VIRT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than VIRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VIRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MC and VIRT are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while VIRT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

VIRT is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.77% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($5.45B) has a higher market cap than VIRT($2.99B). MC has higher P/E ratio than VIRT: MC (24.48) vs VIRT (7.63). MC YTD gains are higher at: 7.187 vs. VIRT (5.582). VIRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. MC (289M). VIRT has more cash in the bank: 708M vs. MC (282M). MC has less debt than VIRT: MC (268M) vs VIRT (8.35B). VIRT has higher revenues than MC: VIRT (3.5B) vs MC (1.47B).
MCVIRTMC / VIRT
Capitalization5.45B2.99B183%
EBITDA289M1.79B16%
Gain YTD7.1875.582129%
P/E Ratio24.487.63321%
Revenue1.47B3.5B42%
Total Cash282M708M40%
Total Debt268M8.35B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs VIRT: Fundamental Ratings
MC
VIRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3851
SMR RATING
1..100
1933
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (20). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (51). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (33). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VIRT (61). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.

VIRT's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (100). This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCVIRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCYAX14.060.10
+0.72%
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl A
ASVNX8.180.03
+0.37%
American Century Small Cap Value C
NEFOX32.060.09
+0.28%
Natixis Oakmark A
FIDEX15.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fd
FMMMX46.90-0.43
-0.91%
American Funds AMCAP 529-F-2

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
+0.10%
EVR - MC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
PIPR - MC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
PJT - MC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
LAZ - MC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
JEF - MC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More

VIRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIRT has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIRT jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIRT
1D Price
Change %
VIRT100%
+3.32%
SF - VIRT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
MS - VIRT
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
NDAQ - VIRT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
MC - VIRT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
MRX - VIRT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More