MC
Price
$77.86
Change
-$0.63 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.79B
12 days until earnings call
VALU
Price
$45.43
Change
-$0.23 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
383.41M
Ad is loading...

MC vs VALU

Header iconMC vs VALU Comparison
Open Charts MC vs VALUBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$77.86
Change-$0.63 (-0.80%)
Volume$6.61K
Capitalization3.79B
Value Line
Price$45.43
Change-$0.23 (-0.50%)
Volume$189
Capitalization383.41M
MC vs VALU Comparison Chart
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. VALU commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and VALU is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (MC: $78.49 vs. VALU: $45.66)
Brand notoriety: MC and VALU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 141% vs. VALU: 57%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. VALU: $383.41M
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. VALU’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $383.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVALU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VALU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than VALU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VALU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VALU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VALU is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.26% price change this week, while VALU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

VALU is expected to report earnings on Dec 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.28% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) has a higher market cap than VALU($383M). MC has higher P/E ratio than VALU: MC (82.58) vs VALU (20.97). MC YTD gains are higher at: 6.240 vs. VALU (-13.523). VALU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.8M vs. MC (-32.04M). MC has more cash in the bank: 186M vs. VALU (67.3M). VALU has less debt than MC: VALU (5.13M) vs MC (216M). MC has higher revenues than VALU: MC (855M) vs VALU (38.2M).
MCVALUMC / VALU
Capitalization3.79B383M988%
EBITDA-32.04M11.8M-271%
Gain YTD6.240-13.523-46%
P/E Ratio82.5820.97394%
Revenue855M38.2M2,238%
Total Cash186M67.3M276%
Total Debt216M5.13M4,210%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs VALU: Fundamental Ratings
MC
VALU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1865
SMR RATING
1..100
6540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9781
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VALU (28) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VALU’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VALU (65) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MC’s stock grew somewhat faster than VALU’s over the last 12 months.

VALU's SMR Rating (40) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MC (65) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that VALU’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as VALU (61) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to VALU’s over the last 12 months.

VALU's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MC (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that VALU’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCVALU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.650.18
+0.66%
GameStop Corp
SPY606.443.39
+0.56%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL223.831.19
+0.53%
Apple
TSLA415.11-8.96
-2.11%
Tesla
BTC.X103653.070000-2493.195300
-2.35%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-0.91%
EVR - MC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
PIPR - MC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
LAZ - MC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
PJT - MC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
HLI - MC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
More

VALU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VALU and PIPR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VALU and PIPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VALU
1D Price
Change %
VALU100%
-1.76%
PIPR - VALU
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
MC - VALU
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
PJT - VALU
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
EVR - VALU
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
LAZ - VALU
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More