MC
Price
$48.07
Change
-$2.49 (-4.92%)
Updated
Apr 7, 10:48 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.79B
16 days until earnings call
SNEX
Price
$68.23
Change
-$1.36 (-1.95%)
Updated
Apr 7, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.22B
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MC vs SNEX

Header iconMC vs SNEX Comparison
Open Charts MC vs SNEXBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$48.07
Change-$2.49 (-4.92%)
Volume$515
Capitalization3.79B
StoneX Group
Price$68.23
Change-$1.36 (-1.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.22B
MC vs SNEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. SNEX commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Buy and SNEX is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MC: $52.94 vs. SNEX: $74.22)
Brand notoriety: MC and SNEX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 130% vs. SNEX: 110%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. SNEX: $2.22B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. SNEX’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSNEX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SNEX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MC and SNEX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNEX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SNEX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNEX is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -11.26% price change this week, while SNEX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +138.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

SNEX is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.42% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) has a higher market cap than SNEX($2.22B). MC has higher P/E ratio than SNEX: MC (82.58) vs SNEX (8.75). SNEX YTD gains are higher at: 13.637 vs. MC (-27.725). SNEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. MC (-32.04M). SNEX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. MC (186M). MC has less debt than SNEX: MC (216M) vs SNEX (8.05B). SNEX has higher revenues than MC: SNEX (67.4B) vs MC (855M).
MCSNEXMC / SNEX
Capitalization3.79B2.22B171%
EBITDA-32.04M1.27B-3%
Gain YTD-27.72513.637-203%
P/E Ratio82.588.75944%
Revenue855M67.4B1%
Total Cash186M1.16B16%
Total Debt216M8.05B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs SNEX: Fundamental Ratings
MC
SNEX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1277
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3120
SMR RATING
1..100
2951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNEX (72) in the null industry. This means that MC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNEX’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as MC (31) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SNEX (51) in the null industry. This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to SNEX’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MC (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MC (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew significantly faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCSNEX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-11.96%
PIPR - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-11.17%
EVR - MC
83%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
PJT - MC
79%
Closely correlated
-6.96%
LAZ - MC
78%
Closely correlated
-15.08%
GS - MC
76%
Closely correlated
-9.21%
More

SNEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNEX has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNEX jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNEX
1D Price
Change %
SNEX100%
-5.82%
SF - SNEX
61%
Loosely correlated
-10.87%
GS - SNEX
60%
Loosely correlated
-9.21%
PIPR - SNEX
59%
Loosely correlated
-11.17%
MC - SNEX
57%
Loosely correlated
-11.96%
EVR - SNEX
57%
Loosely correlated
-15.48%
More