MC
Price
$70.40
Change
-$0.64 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
94 days until earnings call
RJF
Price
$168.53
Change
+$1.69 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
26.84B
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs RJF

Header iconMC vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts MC vs RJFBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$70.40
Change-$0.64 (-0.90%)
Volume$1.56M
Capitalization3.79B
Raymond James Financial
Price$168.53
Change+$1.69 (+1.01%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization26.84B
MC vs RJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. RJF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and RJF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MC: $70.40 vs. RJF: $168.53)
Brand notoriety: MC and RJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 177% vs. RJF: 95%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. RJF: $26.84B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. RJF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $26.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than MC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($26.8B) has a higher market cap than MC($3.79B). MC has higher P/E ratio than RJF: MC (82.58) vs RJF (16.09). RJF YTD gains are higher at: 9.599 vs. MC (-2.734). RJF has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. MC (186M). MC has less debt than RJF: MC (216M) vs RJF (3.14B). RJF has higher revenues than MC: RJF (11.7B) vs MC (855M).
MCRJFMC / RJF
Capitalization3.79B26.8B14%
EBITDA-32.04MN/A-
Gain YTD-2.7349.599-28%
P/E Ratio82.5816.09513%
Revenue855M11.7B7%
Total Cash186M2.61B7%
Total Debt216M3.14B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
MC
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1846
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3012
SMR RATING
1..100
249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (51). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (30). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (24). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (45). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for MC (100). This means that RJF’s stock grew significantly faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWLZX44.390.23
+0.52%
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value Z
MGORX41.170.13
+0.32%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp IR
MXEVX12.04-0.01
-0.08%
Empower Core Strategies Intl Eq Inv
MRASX11.62-0.02
-0.17%
Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Inst
GSIMX22.42-0.07
-0.31%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-0.90%
EVR - MC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
PIPR - MC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
LAZ - MC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
PJT - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
PWP - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+1.01%
SF - RJF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
MS - RJF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
GS - RJF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
MC - RJF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
More