MC
Price
$71.69
Change
+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Updated
Feb 2, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.3B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OPY
Price
$91.02
Change
+$6.99 (+8.32%)
Updated
Feb 2, 01:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
889.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs OPY

Header iconMC vs OPY Comparison
Open Charts MC vs OPYBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$71.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$593
Capitalization5.3B
Oppenheimer Holdings
Price$91.02
Change+$6.99 (+8.32%)
Volume$200
Capitalization889.62M
MC vs OPY Comparison Chart in %
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. OPY commentary
Feb 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a StrongBuy and OPY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 02, 2026
Stock price -- (MC: $71.67 vs. OPY: $84.03)
Brand notoriety: MC and OPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 127% vs. OPY: 223%
Market capitalization -- MC: $5.3B vs. OPY: $889.62M
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.3B. OPY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $889.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than OPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OPY is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while OPY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +8.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.46% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($5.3B) has a higher market cap than OPY($890M). MC has higher P/E ratio than OPY: MC (23.81) vs OPY (6.44). OPY YTD gains are higher at: 16.240 vs. MC (4.262). MC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 289M vs. OPY (248M). MC has more cash in the bank: 282M vs. OPY (28.8M). MC has less debt than OPY: MC (268M) vs OPY (722M). OPY (1.54B) and MC (1.47B) have equivalent revenues.
MCOPYMC / OPY
Capitalization5.3B890M596%
EBITDA289M248M117%
Gain YTD4.26216.24026%
P/E Ratio23.816.44369%
Revenue1.47B1.54B95%
Total Cash282M28.8M979%
Total Debt268M722M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs OPY: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4318
SMR RATING
1..100
1972
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9992
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as OPY (25). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to OPY’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (43). This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPY (72). This means that MC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPY’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (51). This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (99). This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFMMX60.740.03
+0.05%
American Funds American Mutual 529-F-2
FMIQX13.60-0.01
-0.07%
FMI Large Cap Institutional
KMDIX31.66-0.14
-0.44%
Keeley Gabelli Mid Cap Dividend I
BUISX15.59-0.22
-1.39%
Buffalo Small Cap Growth Institutional
FOCSX20.09-0.46
-2.24%
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-0.08%
EVR - MC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
PIPR - MC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
PJT - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
LAZ - MC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
JEF - MC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
More

OPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPY has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OPY jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPY
1D Price
Change %
OPY100%
+10.26%
PIPR - OPY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
SF - OPY
66%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
MS - OPY
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
MC - OPY
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
JEF - OPY
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More