Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXIX vs RHSCX
MBXIX vs RHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBXIX vs. RHSCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBXIX is a Hold and RHSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.77B vs. RHSCX (10.3M). RHSCX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: RHSCX (1.17) vs MBXIX (0.00). MBXIX was incepted earlier than RHSCX: MBXIX (10 years) vs RHSCX (10 years). RHSCX (3.98) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.00). RHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). RHSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXIX: RHSCX (1000) vs MBXIX (2500). RHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. MBXIX (3.92). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.76 vs. RHSCX (16.70).
| MBXIX | RHSCX | MBXIX / RHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 2.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 3.98 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.999 | 3.613 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.77B | 10.3M | 85,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 5.60 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.89 | 40.68 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.76 | 16.70 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement