Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXFX vs RHSCX
MBXFX vs RHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.35B vs. RHSCX (10.3M). RHSCX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: RHSCX (5.90) vs MBXFX (1.11). MBXFX was incepted earlier than RHSCX: MBXFX (5 years) vs RHSCX (9 years). RHSCX (3.98) is less costly to investors than MBXFX (3.03). RHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXFX (19.00). RHSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: RHSCX (1000) vs MBXFX (2500). RHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. MBXFX (0.98). MBXFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. RHSCX (29.09).
| MBXFX | RHSCX | MBXFX / RHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 2.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 3.98 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.608 | 9.793 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.35B | 10.3M | 81,039% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 5.90 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.98 | 3.62 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.96 | 39.19 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.04 | 29.09 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement