Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXFX vs RHSCX
MBXFX vs RHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.77B vs. RHSCX (10.3M). RHSCX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: RHSCX (1.17) vs MBXFX (0.00). MBXFX was incepted earlier than RHSCX: MBXFX (5 years) vs RHSCX (10 years). RHSCX (3.98) is less costly to investors than MBXFX (3.00). RHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXFX (19.00). RHSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: RHSCX (1000) vs MBXFX (2500). RHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. MBXFX (2.89). MBXFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. RHSCX (16.70).
| MBXFX | RHSCX | MBXFX / RHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.00 | 2.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.00 | 3.98 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.929 | 3.613 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.77B | 10.3M | 85,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | 5.60 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.24 | 40.68 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.47 | 16.70 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers