Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXFX vs RHSCX
MBXFX vs RHSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.31B vs. RHSCX (10.1M). RHSCX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: RHSCX (6.09) vs MBXFX (1.10). MBXFX was incepted earlier than RHSCX: MBXFX (5 years) vs RHSCX (10 years). RHSCX (3.98) is less costly to investors than MBXFX (3.03). RHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXFX (19.00). RHSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: RHSCX (1000) vs MBXFX (2500). RHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.36 vs. MBXFX (0.38). MBXFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.30 vs. RHSCX (22.55).
| MBXFX | RHSCX | MBXFX / RHSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 2.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 3.98 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.038 | 7.167 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.31B | 10.1M | 82,238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 6.09 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 1.36 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 32.86 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.30 | 22.55 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers