Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXFX vs RHSAX
MBXFX vs RHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.31B vs. RHSAX (10M). RHSAX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: RHSAX (6.60) vs MBXFX (1.10). MBXFX was incepted earlier than RHSAX: MBXFX (5 years) vs RHSAX (16 years). RHSAX (3.27) is less costly to investors than MBXFX (3.03). RHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXFX (19.00). RHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: RHSAX (1000) vs MBXFX (2500). RHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.10 vs. MBXFX (0.38). MBXFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.30 vs. RHSAX (27.14).
| MBXFX | RHSAX | MBXFX / RHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 2.16 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 3.27 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.038 | 7.923 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.31B | 10M | 83,060% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 6.60 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 2.10 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 35.74 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.30 | 27.14 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement