Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXFX vs RHSAX
MBXFX vs RHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.77B vs. RHSAX (10.3M). RHSAX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: RHSAX (1.52) vs MBXFX (0.00). MBXFX was incepted earlier than RHSAX: MBXFX (5 years) vs RHSAX (16 years). RHSAX (3.27) is less costly to investors than MBXFX (3.00). RHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXFX (19.00). RHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: RHSAX (1000) vs MBXFX (2500). RHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. MBXFX (2.89). MBXFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. RHSAX (21.12).
| MBXFX | RHSAX | MBXFX / RHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.00 | 2.16 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.00 | 3.27 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.929 | 3.687 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.77B | 10.3M | 85,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | 6.35 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.24 | 43.85 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.47 | 21.12 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement