Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXFX vs RHSAX
MBXFX vs RHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.35B vs. RHSAX (10.3M). RHSAX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: RHSAX (6.39) vs MBXFX (1.11). MBXFX was incepted earlier than RHSAX: MBXFX (5 years) vs RHSAX (16 years). RHSAX (3.27) is less costly to investors than MBXFX (3.03). RHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXFX (19.00). RHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: RHSAX (1000) vs MBXFX (2500). RHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.36 vs. MBXFX (0.98). MBXFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. RHSAX (34.03).
| MBXFX | RHSAX | MBXFX / RHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 2.16 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 3.27 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.608 | 10.538 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.35B | 10.3M | 81,039% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 6.39 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.98 | 4.36 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.96 | 42.35 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.04 | 34.03 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement