Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXAX vs RHSAX
MBXAX vs RHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBXAX vs. RHSAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBXAX is a Buy and RHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXAX has more cash in the bank: 8.35B vs. RHSAX (10.3M). RHSAX pays higher dividends than MBXAX: RHSAX (6.39) vs MBXAX (1.61). MBXAX was incepted earlier than RHSAX: MBXAX (10 years) vs RHSAX (16 years). RHSAX (3.27) is less costly to investors than MBXAX (2.28). RHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXAX (19.00). MBXAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RHSAX (5%) vs RHSAX (5%). RHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXAX: RHSAX (1000) vs MBXAX (2500). RHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.36 vs. MBXAX (1.75). MBXAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.73 vs. RHSAX (34.03).
| MBXAX | RHSAX | MBXAX / RHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.16 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 3.27 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.270 | 10.538 | 31% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.35B | 10.3M | 81,039% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 6.39 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 4.36 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.59 | 42.35 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.73 | 34.03 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement