MBWM
Price
$47.71
Change
-$0.27 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
605.34M
86 days until earnings call
NIC
Price
$133.57
Change
+$0.64 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs NIC

Header iconMBWM vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts MBWM vs NICBanner chart's image
Mercantile Bank
Price$47.71
Change-$0.27 (-0.56%)
Volume$56.57K
Capitalization605.34M
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$133.57
Change+$0.64 (+0.48%)
Volume$68.88K
Capitalization1.25B
MBWM vs NIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBWM vs. NIC commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a Hold and NIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MBWM: $47.71 vs. NIC: $133.57)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 67% vs. NIC: 73%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $605.34M vs. NIC: $1.25B
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $605.34M. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the long-term than MBWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.79% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($1.25B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($605M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: NIC (20.55) vs MBWM (7.32). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 27.961 vs. MBWM (9.041). NIC has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. MBWM (64.6M). NIC has less debt than MBWM: NIC (167M) vs MBWM (607M). NIC has higher revenues than MBWM: NIC (278M) vs MBWM (226M).
MBWMNICMBWM / NIC
Capitalization605M1.25B49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.04127.96132%
P/E Ratio7.3220.5536%
Revenue226M278M81%
Total Cash64.6M130M50%
Total Debt607M167M363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7980
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1521
SMR RATING
1..100
1917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (89). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (21). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (19). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (52). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (58). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITIX22.020.23
+1.06%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II M
TAGFX11.610.09
+0.78%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth R6
GMLGX34.990.18
+0.53%
GuideMark® Large Cap Core Service
SVBAX30.530.09
+0.30%
JHancock Balanced A
SSCCX0.37N/A
N/A
Saratoga Small Capitalization C

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-0.56%
PEBO - MBWM
91%
Closely correlated
N/A
CTBI - MBWM
90%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
TCBK - MBWM
90%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
HOPE - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
N/A
IBOC - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
More

NIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIC
1D Price
Change %
NIC100%
+0.48%
CTBI - NIC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
FBK - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
STBA - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
TCBK - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
MBWM - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
More