MBOF
Price
$38.93
Change
-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
71.17M
SSBP
Price
$10.25
Change
+$0.20 (+1.99%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBOF vs SSBP

Header iconMBOF vs SSBP Comparison
Open Charts MBOF vs SSBPBanner chart's image
Marine Bancorp of Florida
Price$38.93
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Volume$200
Capitalization71.17M
SSB Ban
Price$10.25
Change+$0.20 (+1.99%)
Volume$200
Capitalization22.42M
MBOF vs SSBP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBOF vs. SSBP commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBOF is a Hold and SSBP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MBOF: $38.93 vs. SSBP: $10.25)
Brand notoriety: MBOF and SSBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBOF: 48% vs. SSBP: 7%
Market capitalization -- MBOF: $71.17M vs. SSBP: $22.42M
MBOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $71.17M. SSBP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSBP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSBP is a better buy in the long-term than MBOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSBP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SSBP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBOF is a better buy in the short-term than SSBP.

Price Growth

MBOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSBP (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBOF($71.2M) has a higher market cap than SSBP($22.4M). MBOF has higher P/E ratio than SSBP: MBOF (25.12) vs SSBP (12.65). SSBP YTD gains are higher at: -2.381 vs. MBOF (-2.675).
MBOFSSBPMBOF / SSBP
Capitalization71.2M22.4M318%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.675-2.381112%
P/E Ratio25.1212.65198%
RevenueN/A11.7M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A24M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBOF vs SSBP: Fundamental Ratings
MBOF
SSBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
10078
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1331
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4665

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSBP's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MBOF (84). This means that SSBP’s stock grew similarly to MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

SSBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBOF (100). This means that SSBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

SSBP's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MBOF (100). This means that SSBP’s stock grew similarly to MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

SSBP's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MBOF (73). This means that SSBP’s stock grew similarly to MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

MBOF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SSBP (31). This means that MBOF’s stock grew similarly to SSBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBOFSSBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TROUF0.02N/A
N/A
Troubadour Resources Inc.
HXGCF1.63N/A
N/A
Hexagon Composites ASA
HXPLF8.70N/A
N/A
Hexpol AB
EXCH53.00N/A
N/A
Exchange Bankshares, Inc.
PRDSY11.30-0.31
-2.63%
Prada Spa

MBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBOF has been loosely correlated with OAKV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBOF jumps, then OAKV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBOF
1D Price
Change %
MBOF100%
-0.18%
OAKV - MBOF
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SSBP - MBOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFIN - MBOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ITCFY - MBOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHDB - MBOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SSBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSBP and MBOF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSBP and MBOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSBP
1D Price
Change %
SSBP100%
N/A
MBOF - SSBP
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
FNWD - SSBP
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
PONT - SSBP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRNN - SSBP
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOBS - SSBP
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More