MBLY
Price
$14.70
Change
-$0.15 (-1.01%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.96B
87 days until earnings call
VC
Price
$125.13
Change
-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.41B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs VC

Header iconMBLY vs VC Comparison
Open Charts MBLY vs VCBanner chart's image
Mobileye Global
Price$14.70
Change-$0.15 (-1.01%)
Volume$4M
Capitalization11.96B
Visteon
Price$125.13
Change-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Volume$208.15K
Capitalization3.41B
MBLY vs VC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. VC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Hold and VC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MBLY: $14.70 vs. VC: $125.13)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 55% vs. VC: 52%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $11.96B vs. VC: $3.41B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $11.96B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBLY is a better buy in the short-term than VC.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.93% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

VC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($12B) has a higher market cap than VC($3.41B). VC YTD gains are higher at: 41.361 vs. MBLY (-26.205).
MBLYVCMBLY / VC
Capitalization12B3.41B352%
EBITDA-2.51BN/A-
Gain YTD-26.20541.361-63%
P/E RatioN/A11.92-
Revenue1.92BN/A-
Total Cash1.71BN/A-
Total DebtN/A442M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBLY vs VC: Fundamental Ratings
MBLY
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
860
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
9641
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBLY's Valuation (60) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (63). This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.

VC's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MBLY (100). This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

VC's SMR Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBLY (96). This means that VC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

VC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MBLY (59). This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

VC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBLY (100). This means that VC’s stock grew significantly faster than MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNGCX58.460.44
+0.76%
American Funds New Economy 529C
ALVAX23.92N/A
N/A
American Beacon Large Cap Value A
HAMVX28.68N/A
N/A
Harbor Mid Cap Value Instl
SNPTX20.57N/A
N/A
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Institutional
SSPIX104.11-0.32
-0.31%
SEI S&P 500 Index F (SIMT)

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-1.01%
BWA - MBLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
MGA - MBLY
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
VC - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
ALV - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
LEA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More

VC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VC has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VC jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VC
1D Price
Change %
VC100%
-0.22%
ADNT - VC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
LEA - VC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
BWA - VC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
MGA - VC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
ALV - VC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More