MBLY
Price
$15.24
Change
-$0.64 (-4.03%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
25.88B
38 days until earnings call
VC
Price
$89.86
Change
-$3.09 (-3.32%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.23B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs VC

Header iconMBLY vs VC Comparison
Open Charts MBLY vs VCBanner chart's image
Mobileye Global
Price$15.24
Change-$0.64 (-4.03%)
Volume$4.04M
Capitalization25.88B
Visteon
Price$89.86
Change-$3.09 (-3.32%)
Volume$513.08K
Capitalization3.23B
MBLY vs VC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. VC commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a StrongBuy and VC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MBLY: $15.24 vs. VC: $89.86)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 118% vs. VC: 149%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $25.88B vs. VC: $3.23B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $25.88B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBLY and VC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -9.72% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +7.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

VC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($25.9B) has a higher market cap than VC($3.23B). VC YTD gains are higher at: 1.285 vs. MBLY (-23.494). MBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 529M vs. VC (378M). MBLY has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. VC (515M). VC has less debt than MBLY: VC (445M) vs MBLY (3.52B). VC has higher revenues than MBLY: VC (3.95B) vs MBLY (2.08B).
MBLYVCMBLY / VC
Capitalization25.9B3.23B801%
EBITDA529M378M140%
Gain YTD-23.4941.285-1,828%
P/E RatioN/A6.87-
Revenue2.08B3.95B53%
Total Cash1.21B515M235%
Total Debt3.52B445M791%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VC: Fundamental Ratings
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRTA5.080.01
+0.20%
Prothena Corp
COR295.540.50
+0.17%
Cencora
AGRO9.29-0.03
-0.32%
Adecoagro SA
RYN23.43-0.43
-1.80%
Rayonier
DRRX0.62-0.03
-3.91%
DURECT Corp

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-4.03%
BWA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
MGA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.04%
ALV - MBLY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
VC - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
ADNT - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
More

VC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VC has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VC jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VC
1D Price
Change %
VC100%
-3.32%
LEA - VC
78%
Closely correlated
-3.20%
ADNT - VC
76%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
MGA - VC
73%
Closely correlated
-3.04%
BWA - VC
72%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
FOXF - VC
70%
Closely correlated
-4.12%
More