MBLY
Price
$18.34
Change
-$0.10 (-0.54%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
25.88B
24 days until earnings call
QS
Price
$6.62
Change
-$1.03 (-13.46%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.04B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs QS

Header iconMBLY vs QS Comparison
Open Charts MBLY vs QSBanner chart's image
Mobileye Global
Price$18.34
Change-$0.10 (-0.54%)
Volume$3.48M
Capitalization25.88B
QuantumScape
Price$6.62
Change-$1.03 (-13.46%)
Volume$108.57M
Capitalization3.04B
MBLY vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. QS commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Buy and QS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MBLY: $18.34 vs. QS: $6.62)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 98% vs. QS: 503%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $25.88B vs. QS: $3.04B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $25.88B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than MBLY.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +24.59% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +54.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.26% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($25.9B) has a higher market cap than QS($3.04B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 27.553 vs. MBLY (-7.932). MBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 529M vs. QS (-392.95M). MBLY has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. QS (1.07B). QS has less debt than MBLY: QS (101M) vs MBLY (3.52B). MBLY has higher revenues than QS: MBLY (2.08B) vs QS (0).
MBLYQSMBLY / QS
Capitalization25.9B3.04B852%
EBITDA529M-392.95M-135%
Gain YTD-7.93227.553-29%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.08B0-
Total Cash1.21B1.07B113%
Total Debt3.52B101M3,485%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIS278.912.59
+0.94%
Vanguard Industrials ETF
IJUL31.800.21
+0.65%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF July
AVGE77.220.38
+0.49%
Avantis All Equity Markets ETF
TEK27.890.12
+0.43%
iShares Technology Opports Act ETF
LBAY24.47-0.16
-0.63%
Leatherback Long/Short Alt Yld ETF

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-0.54%
BWA - MBLY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
MGA - MBLY
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
ALV - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
VC - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
LEA - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with HYLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then HYLN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-13.46%
HYLN - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
VC - QS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
SES - QS
33%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
MBLY - QS
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
LAZR - QS
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
More