MBLY
Price
$13.50
Change
-$0.10 (-0.74%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.99B
QS
Price
$9.08
Change
+$0.32 (+3.65%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.14B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs QS

Header iconMBLY vs QS Comparison
Open Charts MBLY vs QSBanner chart's image
Mobileye Global
Price$13.50
Change-$0.10 (-0.74%)
Volume$64.04K
Capitalization10.99B
QuantumScape
Price$9.08
Change+$0.32 (+3.65%)
Volume$23.75M
Capitalization5.14B
MBLY vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. QS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Buy and QS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MBLY: $13.60 vs. QS: $8.76)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 72% vs. QS: 67%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $10.99B vs. QS: $5.14B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $10.99B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $5.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $87.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than MBLY.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.37% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +6.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+4.07% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($11B) has a higher market cap than QS($5.14B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 74.952 vs. MBLY (-31.727). QS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -382.46M vs. MBLY (-2.51B). MBLY has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. QS (797M). MBLY has higher revenues than QS: MBLY (1.92B) vs QS (0).
MBLYQSMBLY / QS
Capitalization11B5.14B214%
EBITDA-2.51B-382.46M656%
Gain YTD-31.72774.952-42%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.92B0-
Total Cash1.71B797M214%
Total DebtN/A89.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBLY: Fundamental Ratings
MBLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOIIX18.300.17
+0.94%
Touchstone International Value Instl
FEFRX30.120.26
+0.87%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund R6
RWIEX71.690.37
+0.52%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R4
ESPIX37.82N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Adm
ABCVX23.28-0.12
-0.51%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Inv

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-2.72%
BWA - MBLY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
MGA - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
VC - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
ALV - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
LEA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
+3.65%
SLDP - QS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
MBLY - QS
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
LAZR - QS
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
VC - QS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
INVZ - QS
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More